Current:Home > MySotomayor’s dissent: A president should not be a ‘king above the law’ -Visionary Growth Labs
Sotomayor’s dissent: A president should not be a ‘king above the law’
View
Date:2025-04-25 08:42:06
WASHINGTON (AP) — In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol and efforts to overturn the election.
She called the decision, which likely ended the prospect of a trial for Trump before the November election, “utterly indefensible.”
“The court effectively creates a law-free zone around the president, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the founding,” she wrote, in a dissent joined by the other two liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Sotomayor read her dissent aloud in the courtroom, with a weighty delivery that underscored her criticism of the majority. She strongly pronounced each word, pausing at certain moments and gritting her teeth at others.
“Ironic isn’t it? The man in charge of enforcing laws can now just break them,” Sotomayor said.
Chief Justice John Roberts accused the liberal justices of fearmongering in the 6-3 majority opinion. It found that presidents aren’t above the law but must be entitled to presumptive immunity for official acts so the looming threat of a potential criminal prosecution doesn’t keep them from forcefully exercising the office’s far-reaching powers or create a cycle of prosecutions aimed at political enemies.
While the opinion allows for the possibility of prosecutions for unofficial acts, Sotomayor said it “deprives these prosecutions of any teeth” by excluding any evidence that related to official acts where the president is immune.
“This majority’s project will have disastrous consequences for the presidency and for our democracy,” she said. She ended by saying, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.”
Trump, for his part, has denied doing anything wrong and has said this prosecution and three others are politically motivated to try to keep him from returning to the White House.
The other justices looked on in silence and largely remained still as Sotomayor spoke, with Justice Samuel Alito shuffling through papers and appearing to study them.
Sotomayor pointed to historical evidence, from the founding fathers to Watergate, that presidents could potentially face prosecution. She took a jab at the conservative majority that has made the nation’s history a guiding principle on issues like guns and abortion. “Interesting, history matters, right?”
Then she looked at the courtroom audience and concluded, “Except here.”
The majority feared that the threat of potential prosecution could constrain a president or create a “cycle of factional strife,” that the founders intended to avoid.
Sotomayor, on the other handed, pointed out that presidents have access to extensive legal advice about their actions and that criminal cases typically face high bars in court to proceed.
“It is a far greater danger if the president feels empowered to violate federal criminal law, buoyed by the knowledge of future immunity,” she said. “I am deeply troubled by the idea ... that our nation loses something valuable when the president is forced to operate within the confines of federal criminal law.”
___
Associated Press writer Stephen Groves contributed to this story.
veryGood! (67446)
Related
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Reward grows as 4 escapees from a Georgia jail remain on the run
- Synagogue president found stabbed to death outside home
- A fiery crash of a tanker truck and 2 cars kills at least 1 on the Pennsylvania Turnpike
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- American basketball player attacked in Poland, left with injured eye socket
- Taylor Swift 'Eras Tour' bodyguard fights in Israel-Hamas war
- How Exactly Did Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake's Split Get So Nasty?
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- The recipe for a better 'Bake-Off'? Fun format, good casting, and less host shtick
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- The Vampire Diaries' Kat Graham Marries Bryant Wood in Surprise Ceremony
- Federal judge pauses limited gag order on Trump in 2020 election interference case
- Kenneth Chesebro, Trump co-defendant in Georgia 2020 election case, pleads guilty
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Kourtney Kardashian Shares Heartfelt Birthday Tribute to Kim Kardashian After TV Fights
- Pakistan’s thrice-elected, self-exiled former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif returns home ahead of vote
- Cyprus police arrest 4 people after a small explosion near the Israeli Embassy
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is traveling to China to talk climate change
A car bombing at a Somali military facility kills 6 people, including 4 soldiers, police say
Family member of slain Israelis holds out hope for three missing relatives: It's probably everyone's greatest nightmare
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
ACTORS STRIKE PHOTOS: See images from the 100 days film and TV actors have been picketing
Powerful gusts over Cape Cod as New Englanders deal with another washed-out weekend
This $7 Leave-In Conditioner Gives Me Better Results Than Luxury Haircare Brands